Home  |  Service Overview  |  eBookstore   |  Using Primis Database  |  Completed Order  |  Your Publisher     
My Book Request
Click here to start a new order
  My Primis   |  eBook Options  |  Help / Feedback  |  Primis Online
   Main Catalogs
 
Accounting
Business Communication
Business Law
Economics
Finance
Insurance and Real Estate
Management Information Systems
Management and Organization
Marketing
Operations and Decision Sciences
 
   Special Catalogs
   
Case Studies
Text Chapters Mapped to
Specific Cases

How to Build a Book: Select Content Review & Arrange Personalize Request a Copy
Keyword
  
Title, Author, Case #, Etc.
ALEKS
Homework Manager
Discover Econ
 
Learning Solutions Group
 





 
Harvard Business Review Brief Cases — Entrepreneurship
 • To include an item in your complimentary custom book, click the item’s Add link.
If there is a View link next to an item, you can view the pages by clicking on the link.
 • To review the list of items you have selected so far, click on Step 2 in the progress bar above.
   Go Global — or No?
  Add   View  5 pp.  Case Study
Author(s): Kuemmerle, Walter
Publication Date: 06/01/2001
Product Type: Harvard Business Review Article
HBS Number: R0106X
Subjects: Expansion; Globalization; HBR case discussions; International business; International operations; Software
Academic Discipline: Entrepreneurship
Product Description: Only a few weeks ago, Greg McNally, the CEO of software start-up DataClear, had called an off-site in Montana to celebrate his company's success in racking up $5 million in sales from its first product, ClearCloud — a powerful data analysis package. But that was before his talented and successful head of sales, Susan Moskowski, gave him the news about VisiDat, a British start-up that was testing a data analysis package of its own that was only weeks away from launch. “We need to agree on a strategy for dealing with this kind of competition,” Susan had told Greg. “If they start out as a global player, and we stay hunkered down in the U.S., they'll kill us.” Because of that news, Greg had changed the agenda of the off-site, instead having Susan present the options for taking DataClear global. The meeting had taken place two weeks ago, at which point the consensus had been to establish a European presence and probably one in Japan. The only question seemed to be whether to do it from scratch or to form partnerships with local players. Did DataClear really need to go global? Should it instead expand into different domestic markets? Should it do both at once? Could the company afford to?
  Add   View  9 pp.  Case Study and Commentary
Author(s): Kuemmerle, Walter; Killen, Heather; Sander, Alison; Schiffman, Barry; Schnell, Scott
Publication Date: 06/01/2001
Product Type: Harvard Business Review Article
HBS Number: R0106A
Subjects: Expansion; Globalization; HBR case discussions; International business; International operations; Software
Academic Discipline: Entrepreneurship
Product Description: Only a few weeks ago, Greg McNally, the CEO of software start-up DataClear, had called an off-site in Montana to celebrate his company's success in racking up $5 million in sales from its first product, ClearCloud — a powerful data analysis package. But that was before his talented and successful head of sales, Susan Moskowski, gave him the news about VisiDat, a British start-up that was testing a data analysis package of its own that was only weeks away from launch. “We need to agree on a strategy for dealing with this kind of competition,” Susan had told Greg. “If they start out as a global player, and we stay hunkered down in the U.S., they'll kill us.” Because of that news, Greg had changed the agenda of the off-site, instead having Susan present the options for taking DataClear global. The meeting had taken place two weeks ago, at which point the consensus had been to establish a European presence and probably one in Japan. The only question seemed to be whether to do it from scratch or to form partnerships with local players. Did DataClear really need to go global? Should it instead expand into different domestic markets? Should it do both at once? Could the company afford to?
   Good Money After Bad?
  Add   View  8 pp.  Case Study
Author(s): Mullins, John W.
Publication Date: 03/01/2007
Product Type: Harvard Business Review Article
HBS Number: R0703X
Subjects: Angel financing; Brief case; Business models; HBR case discussions; Investments; Marketplace analysis; Strategic thinking; Strategy analysis; Target markets; Venture capital
Academic Discipline: Entrepreneurship
Product Description: Christian Harbinson, a young associate at the venture capital firm Scharfstein Weekes, has a difficult decision to make before the next investment committee meeting. He's been watching over SW's investment in Seven Peaks Technologies, and sales of its single product have been disappointing. Now the company's head, Jack Brandon, wants another $400,000 to pursue a new product. Harbinson believes in Brandon and in his proprietary technology — a titanium alloy that prevents surgical instruments from sticking to tissue. Three years ago, Brandon quit his job and put $65,000 of his savings into developing a nonstick cauterizing device. Two distributors offered to carry it after they saw his demonstration at a trade show, and a couple of surgeons, quickly becoming enthusiastic, promised testimonials. But if Brandon's cauterizer is to take off, surgeons will have to abandon the forceps they've traditionally used and switch to the Seven Peaks device — a change in behavior that will come slowly if at all. So, Brandon thinks, why not adapt his alloy to a line of forceps? Now Harbinson wonders if he himself has become emotionally overinvested in Seven Peaks and if this decision is as much a test of his VC potential as of the actual deal. Should Scharfstein Weekes back Brandon's company with a second round of funding, or would it be a case of throwing good money after bad?
  Add   View  12 pp.  Case Study and Commentary
Author(s): Mullins, John W.; Farneti, Ivan; Hassan, Fred; Johnson, Robert M.; Zott, Christoph
Publication Date: 03/01/2007
Product Type: Harvard Business Review Article
HBS Number: R0703A
Subjects: Angel financing; Brief case; Business models; HBR case discussions; Investments; Marketplace analysis; Strategic thinking; Strategy analysis; Target markets; Venture capital
Academic Discipline: Entrepreneurship
Product Description: Christian Harbinson, a young associate at the venture capital firm Scharfstein Weekes, has a difficult decision to make before the next investment committee meeting. He's been watching over SW's investment in Seven Peaks Technologies, and sales of its single product have been disappointing. Now the company's head, Jack Brandon, wants another $400,000 to pursue a new product. Harbinson believes in Brandon and in his proprietary technology — a titanium alloy that prevents surgical instruments from sticking to tissue. Three years ago, Brandon quit his job and put $65,000 of his savings into developing a nonstick cauterizing device. Two distributors offered to carry it after they saw his demonstration at a trade show, and a couple of surgeons, quickly becoming enthusiastic, promised testimonials. But if Brandon's cauterizer is to take off, surgeons will have to abandon the forceps they've traditionally used and switch to the Seven Peaks device — a change in behavior that will come slowly if at all. So, Brandon thinks, why not adapt his alloy to a line of forceps? Now Harbinson wonders if he himself has become emotionally overinvested in Seven Peaks and if this decision is as much a test of his VC potential as of the actual deal. Should Scharfstein Weekes back Brandon's company with a second round of funding, or would it be a case of throwing good money after bad?